NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Ryde City Council v Transfield Pty Ltd t/as Transfield Tunnelling & Anor [2002] NSWSC 1037 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55034/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 23-24 October 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 November 2002
Ryde City Council (Pltf) PARTIES : Transfield Pty Ltd t/as Transfield Tunnelling (1D) T M McDougall (2D) JUDGMENT OF : McClellan J
LOWER COURT Arbitration JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT T M McDougall - Arbitrator JUDICIAL OFFICER :
B W Collins QC/M Dempsey (Pltf) COUNSEL : P R Callaghan SC/D M Loewenstein (1D) T M McDougall (2D submitting appearance) Blake Dawson Waldron (Pltf) SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques (1D) Phillips Fox (2D) CATCHWORDS : COMMERCIAL - arbitration - application for leave to appeal - whether there was an error on the face of the award in relation to latent conditions - whether there was an error in relation to overheads and profit - whether there was an error in relation to excess spoil removal - whether arbitrator had considered the contractual documents when making his decision - leave granted in part LEGISLATION CITED : Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 s 38(4)(5) State of New South Wales v Coya (Constructions) Pty Ltd, unreported, 4 August 1995, Court of Appeal CASES CITED : Natoli v Walker, unreported, 26 May 1994, Court of Appeal Dennis Willcox Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 79 ALR 267 DECISION : Para 66
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate