NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (In Liq); Lamru Pty Ltd v Kation Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 189 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3081/97; 1750/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 8 March 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 March 2002
3081/97 Peter Lawrence Lewis (P) Lamru Pty Ltd (Applicant) Kation Pty Ltd (Respondent) PARTIES : Brian Raymond Silvia (Liquidator) 1750/02 Lamru Pty Limited (P) Kation Pty Limited (D1) Peter Lawrence Lewis (D2) Mark Lewis (D3) JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
J Baird, Solicitor (P J Lewis & Kation P/L) COUNSEL : S J Motbey (Lamru P/L) P A Somerset, Solicitor (Liquidator) M Wilks, Solicitor (M Lewis) Kemp Strang (P L Lewis & Kation P/L) SOLICITORS : Lyons & Lyons (Lamru P/L) Abbott Tout (Liquidator) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (M Lewis) CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE [105] - Supreme Court procedure - Practice under Supreme Court Rules - Directions - Power to make directions to facilitate just cheap and quick disposal of real issues between parties - Whether consolidated points of claim in identical form should be filed in two proceedings being heard together although one is a statutory appeal under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). CASES CITED : Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2002] NSWSC 143 DECISION : Consolidated points of claim in identical form to be filed in both proceedings.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate