NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : GLI-DON v NOMINAL DEFENDANT [2002] NSWCA 305 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40889/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 August 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 October 2002
Gli-Don Pty Ltd v PARTIES : Nominal Defendant and & Todd Alan Finlay JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Beazley JA at 2; Brownie AJA at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 7703/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sorby DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Appellant - D F Rofe QC/A J Tudehope COUNSEL : Respondent - R R Bartlett SC J G Duncan SOLICITORS : Appellant - Harris McHugh Lawyers Tamworth Respondent - Abbott Tout Sydney CATCHWORDS : APPEAL - findings of fact - no question of principle LEGISLATION CITED : Motor Accidents Act 1988 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 CASES CITED: State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Limited (1999) 73 ALJR 306 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs - orders made
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
40889/01 DC 7703/97 HANDLEY JA BEAZLEY JA BROWNIE AJA
11 October 2002 GLI-DON PTY LTD v THE NOMINAL DEFENDANT & ANOR
APPEAL – findings of fact – no question of principle
A collision occurred between a motor cycle and an uninsured tractor on a public road. The victim sued the Nominal Defendant, who subsequently brought a cross-claim against the second respondent (as the driver) and the appellant (as the owner) of the tractor.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate