NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Philips; Regina v Simpson [2002] NSWCCA 167 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60720/01; 60721/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 May 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 May 2002
PARTIES : Regina v Stephen John Philips Regina v Danielle Simpson JUDGMENT OF : Greg James J at 1; Carruthers AJ at 2
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/11/0832; 01/11/0879 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL His Honour Judge Shillington QC OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Crown - W.G. Dawe QC Applicants - M. Johnson (Philips); H. Dhanji (Simpson) Crown - S.E. O'Connor SOLICITORS : Applicants - Ross Hill & Associates (Philips); D.J. Humphreys (Simpson) CATCHWORDS : Sentencing appeals - sentencing judge did not quantify discount for plea of guilty - further, did not specifically backdate sentence for pre-sentence custody - desirability of quantifying discount for plea and backdating for pre-sentence custody emphasised - R v Howard [2001] NSWCCA 309 applied Crimes Act 1900, s 97(1) LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, ss 21A(2)(c)(iii) , 22(1), 24, 47(3) Justices Act 1902, s 51A Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 Regina v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 Regina v Deeble (CCA, 19 September 1991, unreported) Regina v English [2000] NSWCCA 245 Regina v Frascella [2001] NSWCCA 137 CASES CITED: Regina v Henry & Ors (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Regina v Hitchens [1983] 3 NSWLR 318 Regina v Howard [2001] NSWCCA 309 Regina v McHugh (1985) 1 NSWLR 588 Regina v Rose [2001] NSWCCA 370 Regina v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Regina v Thwaites (CCA 1993, unreported) DECISION : Philips - Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed.; Simpson - Leave to appeal granted, appeal allowed. Sentence varied; see par 64.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate