NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Guerin v Watts [2002] NSWSC 692 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20240/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 August 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 August 2002
PARTIES : Michelle Guerin - Plaintiff Dr Alan Watts - Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Simpson J
COUNSEL : L Whalan - Plaintiff S Woods - Defendant SOLICITORS : Golsby Whiteley - Plaintiff Blake Dawson Waldron - Defendant CATCHWORDS : professional negligence - joint meeting of experts prior to hearing of claim for damages DECISION : The orders I make are: (i) that a joint meeting of experts take place pursuant to Pt 36 rule 13 CA; (ii) that the legal representatives of the parties prepare a document of the kind I have just mentioned; (iii) that the defendant's legal representatives prepare bundles of material, including draft sets of assumptions, experts' reports and questions for consideration of the medical practitioners; (iv) I note that the condition that the defendant meet the costs in first instance is not intended to be a condition that, in the event the plaintiff is unsuccessful, they would not be entitled to recover those costs. That would be a matter for separate consideration. The intention of that condition is simply to facilitate the conference taking place; (v) subject to anything counsel might say, I order the costs of this application be costs in the cause.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION professional negligence list
SIMPSON J
Friday 2 August 2002
20240/00 Michelle GUERIN v Alan WATTS
JUDGMENT 1 SIMPSON J: This is an application that a joint meeting of experts take place preliminary to the hearing of the plaintiff's claim for damages against the defendant in which she asserts that he, as a medical practitioner, was negligent in his treatment of her.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate