NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Spira [2002] NSWSC 905 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50066/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 16/09/02,17/09/02,18/09/02,19/09/02,20/09/02,23/09/02,24/09/02,25/09/02,26/09/02,27/09/02,3/10/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 November 2002
PARTIES : Commonwealth Bank of Australia - Plaintiff/Cross-defendant John Spira - Defendant/Cross-claimant JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J
COUNSEL : Mr M Walton SC/ Mr R S Hollo for the Plaintiff Mr R B S MacFarlan QC/ Mr P Durack for the Defendant SOLICITORS : L E Taylor Solicitor for the plaintiff Middletons Lawyer for the defendant CATCHWORDS : TRADE PRACTICES - Consumer Protection - No Misleading or Deceptive Conduct - Meaning of Unconscionable Conduct - Whether it extends beyond Special Disability - Special Disability limited to Incapacity to form Judgment on Best Interests - CONTRACT - Construction and Interpretation of Contracts - Implied term of Good Faith in Commercial Contracts - Implication by Law - Whether Term of Good Faith can be excluded - Pre-contractual documents and Masters v Cameron LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Jones v Dunkel (1958-1959) 101 CLR 298 Pappas v Saulac Pty Ltd (1983) 50 ALR 231 at 234-235 General Newspapers Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation (1993) 45 FCR 164 at 178 Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jacks Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 187 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 142 CLR 337 at 345-346 Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v Carlton & United Breweries Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 468 at 486-487 Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 at 256 Liverpool City council v Irwin [1977] AC 239 at 254 Miller v Hancock [1893] 2 QB 177 at 181 Mainland Holdings v Szady [2002] NSWSC 699 at par 64 Hughes Aircraft Systems International v Airservices Australia (1997) 76 FCR 151 at 192-193 Hughes Bros Pty Ltd v Trustees of Roman Catholic Church (Archdiocese of Sydney) (1993) 31 NSWLR 91 Alcatel Australia Ltd v Scarcella (1998) 44 NSWLR 349 Saxby Bridge Mortages Pty Ltd v Saxby Bridge Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 433 Asia Television Ltd v Yau's Entertainment Pty Ltd (2000) 48 IPR 283 Szymonowski & Co v Beck & Co [1923] 1 KB 457 at 466 Duncombe v Porter (1953) 90 CLR 295 at 306, 311 GH Myers & Co v Brent Cross Services Co [1934] 1 KB 46 at 55 CASES CITED : Young & Marten Ltd v McManus Childs Ltd [1969] 1 AC 454 Gloucestershire County Council v Richardson [1969] 1 AC 480 at 494-495, 506, 510 Helicopter Sales (Australia) Pty Ltd v Rotor-Work Pty Ltd (1994) 132 CLR 1 at 17 Paragon Finance plc v Nash [2002] 1 WLR 685 at 699-700 Overlook v Foxtel [2002] NSWSC 965 at par 210 Far Horizons Pty Ltd v McDonalds Australia Ltd [2000] VSC 310 at par 120 Garry Rogers Motors Aust Pty Ltd v Subaru (Aust) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 903 at par 34 Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 at 450 DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423 at 434 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Renstel Nominees Pty Ltd [2001] VSC 167 at par 96 Howtrac Rentals Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors (NZ) Ltd VSC 145 Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 at 360 Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 at 637 Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 at 405 Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1982-1983) 151 CLR 447 at 461,474 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v CG Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) (1999) 96 FCR 491 at 502-504 CG Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2001) 185 ALR 555 at 569 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Samton Holdings Pty Ltd (2000) 189 ALR 76 at 91-93 GPG (Australia Trading) Pty Ltd v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (2001) 191 ALR 342 at 389 DECISION : Judgment for the plaintiff. Cross-claims dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate