NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Nagle & Anor - as Executors, Estate Late Marie Jewell Lodge v Lavender [2002] NSWSC 611 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4475/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 24/6/02-28/6/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 July 2002
PARTIES : Patricia Nagle & Richard Patrick Nagle as Executors of the Estate Late Marie Jewell Lodge (Plaintiffs/Cross Defendants) Geoffrey Lavender (Defendant/Cross Claimant) JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
COUNSEL : M Ashhurst (Plaintiffs/Cross Defendants) R Lovas (Defendant/Cross Claimant) SOLICITORS : Blackshaw Lindsay (Plaintiffs/Cross Defendants) George Loupos & Associates (Defendant/Cross Claimant) CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - fiduciary obligations - misappropriation of money by fiduciary agent - no question of principle decided - EVIDENCE - burden of proof, presumptions and weight and sufficiency of evidence - claims against deceased's estate - EVIDENCE - burden of proof, presumptions and weight and sufficiency of evidence - effect of destruction of documents - EQUITY - fiduciary obligations - claim for "damages for breach of fiduciary duty" - meaning and availability LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Supreme Court Act 1970 Allen v Tobias (1958) 98 CLR 367 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 CASES CITED : Clive Eggins & 2 Ors v Allan Robinson [2000] NSWCA 61 Hunt v Barlow [2000] NSWSC 324 Seager v Copydex (No2) [1969] 1 WLR 809 Simon v NRMA Insurance Ltd (NSW Court of Appeal, 22 October 1991, unreported) DECISION : Misappropriated money to be repaid with interest
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate