NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Director of Public Prosecutions v Wesam Abdullah [2002] NSWSC 938 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11865/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 3 October 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 October 2002
Director of Public Prosecutions - Plaintiff PARTIES : Wesam Abdullah - Defendant NRMA Insurance Ltd - Interested Party JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J
G Rees (solicitor) - Plaintiff COUNSEL : J Donnellan (solicitor) - Defendant T Powell (solicitor) - Interested Party Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : LM Williams & Associates - Defendant Abbot Tout - Interested Party CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - proceeds of crime - confiscation - forfeiture - "tainted property" - motor vehicle partly comprising parts from a stolen vehicle - hardship - WORDS & PHRASES - tainted property - motor vehicle partly comprising parts from a stolen vehicle. LEGISLATION CITED : Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989, ss 13, 18(1) Crimes Act 1900, s 188 R v Hadad (1989) 16 NSWLR 476 CASES CITED : Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v King (2000) 49 NSWLR 727 Director of Public Prosecutions v Garner (1999 - County Court of Victoria - unreported) R v Bolger (1989) 16 NSWLR 115 DECISION : Forfeiture order made.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
DUNFORD J
Friday, 4 OCTOBER 2002
011865/01 Director of Public Prosecutions v Wesam Abdullah
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate