NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Emad Sleiman [2003] NSWCCA 231 HEARING DATE(S) : 6/11/02;2/12/02;17/2/03;18/2/03;19/2/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 August 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Sully J at 1; Dunford J at 91; Kirby J at 92 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed.
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Mickelberg v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 259 at 273 R v PLV (2001) 123 A Crim R 194 R v Bikic [2002] NSWCCA 227 Gilbert v The Queen [2000] CLR 414 McClean v Commonwealth of Australia, unreported, 27 June 1996 CASES CITED : Regina v M [2002] NSWCCA 66 Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510 Lawless v The Queen (1979) 142 CLR 659 Gallagher v The Queen (1985) 160 CLR 392 R v William Woodcock (1789) 1 Leach 500; 168 ER 352 R v Salama [1999] NSWCCA 105 R v Rose (2002) 55 NSWLR 701 PARTIES : Regina Emad Sleiman FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60505/99 COUNSEL : P. G. Ingram - Crown P. Kintominas - Appellant SOLICITORS : S. E. O'Connor - Crown Kekatos Lawyers - Appellant
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 70216/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sperling J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60505/99
SULLY J DUNFORD J KIRBY J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate