NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Collins v McGain & Anor [2002] NSWSC 740 revised - 28/08/2002 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2403/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 12/08/02,13/08/02,14/08/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 August 2002
PARTIES : David John Collins - Plaintiff Beverley Ann McGain & Lloyd Mead - Defendants JUDGMENT OF : Acting Master Berecry
COUNSEL : T Hodgson (Plaintiff) R Darke S.C. (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Harris & Compant Solicitors (Plaintiff) Lane & Lane (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Purpose of the Act - divesting assets by gift - - maintenance of lavish lifestyle - spouses assets to be considered - absence of evidence supporting plaintiff's needs - long estrangement from deceased - - moral right. LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act, 1982 (NSW) Testator's Family Maintenance and Guardianship of Infants Act 1916 (NSW) Stuart v McDougall (unreported NSWSC 19.11.87) Singer v Berghouse (No 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201 Daly v Smith (unreported) NSWSC 25 May 1994 Blore v Lang (1960) 104 CLR 124 at 137 Bosch v the Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd (1938) AC 463 at 477 CASES CITED : Cooper v Dungan (1976) 50 ALJR 539 at 542 Cook v Cook (unreported NSWCA 14.10.97) Caska v Caska (1989) NSWSC 289 at [33] Eggler v Mitchelmore (unreported NSWCA 11.11.92) Moratelli v Westhoff (unreported 2000 NSWSC 279 Shearer and the Public Trustee; Hawke and the Public Trustee (unreported BC 9801169 Young J 23 March 1998) DECISION : 1.The proceedings be dismissed and the plaintiff pay the defendant's costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate