NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Dorsett [2002] NSWCCA 326 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60813/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 20 March 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 August 2002
PARTIES : Regina (NSW) Adam Dorsett (Applicant) JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J at 1; Carruthers AJ at 18
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/11/0745 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Blanch CJ/DC OFFICER :
COUNSEL : GIO Rowling (Crown) SOLICITORS : SE O'Connor (Crown) Hal Ginges and Co (Applicant) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE - sentencing - armed robbery - multiple offences - neccessity discrete sentences. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900, s 97 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 44(2) R v Harris [2001] NSWCCA 332 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v Barton [2001] NSWCCA 63, 121 A Crim R 185 R v Bavadra [2000] NSWCCA 292, 115 A Crim R 152 CASES CITED: Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Thomson [2000] NSWCCA 309, 49 NSWLR 383 Power v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 623 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111, 46 NSWLR 346 R v Lemene [2001] NSWCCA 5 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted, sentences quashed, applicant re-sentenced. See para 17.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60813/00
DUNFORD J CARRUTHERS AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate