NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Love v. Muratore [2002] NSWCA 15 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40743/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 February 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 February 2002
PARTIES : Beverley Ann Love - appellant Orazio Ronald Muratore - respondent JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1, 40, 42; Heydon JA at 41; Hodgson JA at 2
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 2556/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Woods DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr. R. Pincus for appellant Mr. D. Higgs SC with Mr. A. Ivantsoff for respondent SOLICITORS : S.M. Boyle & Co., Cronulla for appellant Tress Cocks & Maddox, Sydney for respondent CATCHWORDS : CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Limitation period - Claim in respect of personal injury - Application to extend period - Medical opinion supporting duty - No notice that this contested, no objection, no cross-examination - Refusal on basis that kind of injury unforeseeable - Appeal from that refusal upheld. ND LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969, s.18A, s.60C Dow Corning Australia Pty. Ltd. v. Paton, Court of Appeal, 13 March 1998 per Mason P. CASES CITED: Nowlan v. Marson Transport Pty. Ltd. [2001] NSWCA 346 Russo v. Aiello [2001] NSWCA 306 DECISION : 1. The appeal is allowed; 2. The respondent to pay the appellant's cost of the appeal; 3. The costs of the extension application in the District court to be costs in the cause; 4. Pursuant to section 60C of the Limitation Act 1969, that the time for filing the statement of claim in these proceedings be extended to 9 April 1999.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate