NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : KOSCIUSKO THREDBO PTY LIMITED v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES & ORS; ALPINE LEISURE PTY LIMITED v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES & ORS; GUNYANG SKI CLUB CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES & ANOR; LEATHERBARREL LODGE CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES & ORS; TEH v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES & ANOR; RARIDA PTY LIMITED T/AS THE WINTERHAUS LODGE v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES & ORS; KOSCIUSKO ALPINE CLUB LIMITED v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES & ORS [2002] NSWSC 329 revised - 1/05/2002 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20349/00; 20362/01; 20355/00; 20126/01; 20007/01; 20650/00; 20704/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 April 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 April 2002
PARTIES : Kosciusko Thredbo Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales, the Minister Administering the National Parks & Wildlife Act 1974, Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW, Oxbara Pty Ltd t/as Rye Plant Hire, Snowy Mountains Engineering Corporation Limited; Alpine Leisure Club Ltd v National Parks & Wildlife Service & Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW; Gunyang Ski Club Co-Operative Ltd v National Parks & Wildlife Service and Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW; Leatherbarrell Lodge Co-Operative Ltd v National Parks & Wildlife Service and Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW; Margaret Jean Teh v National Parks & Wildlife Service and Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW; Rarida Pty Limited t/as Winterhaus Lodge v National Parks & Wildlife Service and Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW; Kosciusko Alpine Club Limited v National Parks & Wildlife Service and Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW JUDGMENT OF : Adams J at 1
COUNSEL : Mr D Hammerschlag SC with Mr D R Stack (Applicants to the Motions) Mr J A Maconachie QC with Mr S Gregory (State of NSW interests) SOLICITORS : Various as noted CATCHWORDS : Abuse of process - evidenced by settlement discussions - whether discussions admissible - whether abuse of process is "deliberate abuse of a power" within s 131(2)(k) Evidence Act 1995 - whether evidence of settlement discussions adduced on voir dire is a disclosure within s 131(2)(b) - mere hope for commercial advantages not inappropriate motive for litigation. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Liability Act 1991 Idoport Pty Limited v National Australia Bank Limited (unreported, 2 April 2001 NSWSC, Hodgson CJ in Eq) CASES CITED : Jermyn v Spargos Mining Pty Limite (unreported, 20 March 2001 WASC, Anderson J) Williams v Spautz (1991-2) 174 CLR 509 DECISION : Notice of Motion dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate