NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2003) Aust Torts Reports 81-698
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : GORDON v TAMWORTH JOCKEY CLUB INC [2003] NSWCA 82 HEARING DATE(S) : 7 April 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 April 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Beazley JA at 44; Giles JA at 45 DECISION : 1 Grant leave to appeal; 2 Dismiss the appeal with costs.
CATCHWORDS : Torts - Negligence - Occupier's liability - Duty of care to third parties - Injury caused by criminal assault of employee - Whether employer vicariously liable - Whether duty to take care to prevent deliberate harm - Whether breach of duty LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 Ashrafi Persian Trading Co Pty Ltd v Ashrafinia (2002) Aust Tort Reps 81-636 Chomentowski v Red Garter Restaurant Pty Ltd (1970) 92 WN (NSW) 1070 Chordas v Bryant (Wellington) Pty Ltd (1988) 20 FCR 91 Club Italia (Geelong) Inc v Ritchie [2001] VSCA 180, 17 October 2001 Deatons Pty Ltd v Flew (1949) 79 CLR 370 Hargrave v Goldman (1963) 110 CLR 40 Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 21 Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil (2000) 205 CLR 254 CASES CITED : New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 77 ALJR 558 Public Transport Corporation v Sartori [1997] 1 VR 168 Pyrenees Shire Council v Day (1998) 192 CLR 330 Scott v Davis (2000) 204 CLR 333 Smith v Leurs (1945) 70 CLR 256 Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16 Wormald v Robertson (1992) Aust Tort Reps 81-180 Yewens v Noakes (1880) 6 QBD 530 Zuijs v Wirth Bros Pty Ltd (1955) 93 CLR 561 PARTIES : Penni Bernadette Gordon - Appellant Tamworth Jockey Club Inc - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40505/02 COUNSEL : K Howe/T Bland - Appellant P Biggins - Respondent SOLICITORS : Maxwell & Co - Appellant Lyons Barnett & Kennedy - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate