NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : LANGLANDS v SIMOVIC [2002] NSWCA 57 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40865/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 March 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 March 2002
KEVIN LANGLANDS PARTIES : v DAMON SIMOVIC JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Beazley JA at 18; Ipp AJA at 19
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 5013/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Hogan ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant - A S Morrison SC Respondent - D J Cutler SOLICITORS : Appellant - Vandervords Respondent - Ferguson Holz CATCHWORDS : MOTOR ACCIDENTS ACT - limitation period - extension of time - full and satisfactory explanation LEGISLATION CITED : Motor Accidents Act CASES CITED: n/a. DECISION : Leave to appeal refused. Orders made.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 40865/01 DC 5013/01
HANDLEY JA BEAZLEY JA IPP AJA
4 March 2002 KEVIN LANGLANDS v DAMON SIMOVIC
MOTOR ACCIDENTS ACT – limitation period – extension of time – full and satisfactory explanation
Under s 52(4) of the Motor Accidents Act leave may be granted to commence proceedings more than three years after the date of the motor accident to which the claim related, but the claimant must provide a full and satisfactory explanation for the delay (s 52 (4B)(a)).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate