NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v CDH [2002] NSWCCA 103 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60411/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 March 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 April 2002
PARTIES : Regina v CDH JUDGMENT OF : Levine J at 1; Carruthers AJ at 2
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/31/0406 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Her Honour Judge English OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Crown - P.E. Barrett Applicant - P.J.D. Hamill SOLICITORS : Crown - S.E. O'Connor Applicant - D.J. Humphreys CATCHWORDS : Sentence appeal - various sexual offences against a child under ten - whether sufficient allowance for admissions to the police under the Ellis principle. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900, s 61M(1), s 66A, s 66B House v The King (1936) 35 CLR 499 R v AB (CCA, 7 July 1997, unreported) R v AGR (CCA 24 July 1998, unreported) R v Balfour (CCA 31 July 1996, unreported) R v Davis [2001] NSWCCA 70 CASES CITED: R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 R v Leon (CCA, 30 November 1994, unreported) R v McLear (NSWCCA, 1 September 1992) R v Mangoline (CCA, 17 August 1998) R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534 R v Wahabzadah [2001] NSWCCA, unreported Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21 DECISION : Application for leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed. For re-sentencing see pars 39-43
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60411/01
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate