NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : JAMES EDWARD BROMLEY & ORS v FORESTRY COMMISSION OF NSW [2003] NSWCA 252 HEARING DATE(S) : 1 August 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 September 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Meagher JA at 46; Sheller JA at 47 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS : Damages - interpretation of special condition in Crown lease - whether compensable damage sustained - "loss" - whether diminution in value - whether costs recoverable for restoration of land (ND) PARTIES : James Edward BROMLEY & Ors v FORESTRY COMMISSION OF NSW FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41088/02, CA 40164/03 COUNSEL : Appellants: A S Martin SC Respondent: G C Lindsay SC SOLICITORS : Appellants: Deacons Crown Solicitor's Office
LOWER COURT Supreme Court - Equity Division JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT SC 1847/96 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Macready AJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 41088/02 CA 40164/03
MASON P MEAGHER JA SHELLER JA
Thursday 11 September 2003
BROMLEY & ORS v FORESTRY COMMISSION OF NSW
FACTS Orders made by this Court in Bromley& Ors v Forestry Commission of New South Wales (2001) 51 NSWLR 378 declared that on the proper construction of special condition (n) of a Crown lease, the respondent was to pay the appellants one third of any royalty received on timber removed from the forest areas of the lease, to compensate for damage done to the appellants' interests in the leaseholding by licensed timber operations.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate