NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Custom Coaches (Sales) Pty Ltd v Frankish [2002] NSWSC 469 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2530/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 14, 15 & 17 May 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 May 2002
Custom Coaches (Sales) Pty Limited (P) PARTIES : Peter Alan Frankish (D1) Susan Jennifer Robinson (D2) Catherine Frances Frankish (D3) JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
T J Hancock & M Snedden (P) COUNSEL : No appearance (D1 & 2) J J Dowd, Solicitor (D3) Norman Waterhouse Lawyers (P) SOLICITORS : No appearance (D1 & 2) Watts McCray (D3) CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE [115] - Supreme Court procedure - Practice under Supreme Court Rules - Master's inquiries - May be ordered at any time - Order for further consideration by Court. LEGISLATION CITED : Consolidated Equity Rules of 1902 r 223 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Part 13 r 2, Part 17 r 2(a), r 3(d), r 9, Part 48 r 2, Part 49 r 2 Bennett v Moore (1876) 1 Ch D 692 Brassington v Cussons (1876) 24 WR 881 CASES CITED : Gatti v Webster (1879) 12 Ch D 771 Meehan v Glazier Holdings Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 22 1 Daniell's Chancery Practice (7th ed, 1901) 942 1 Seton's Judgments and Orders (7th ed, 1912) 181 - 182 DECISION : Summary judgment entered for parts of plaintiff's claim. Inquiries before Master ordered in respect of balance of claims. Proceedings adjourned for further consideration.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate