NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : West Harbour Rugby Football Club Ltd v New South Wales Rugby Union Ltd [2001] NSWSC 757 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3993/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 16/08/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 August 2001
West Harbour Rugby Football Club Ltd (P1) PARTIES : Malaga Leota (P2) New South Wales Rugby Union Ltd (D1) Southern Districts Rugby Union Football Club (D10) JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
B J Gross QC and J R Clarke (P) COUNSEL : S D Rares SC and P J Brereton (D1) D Hand (S)(D10) Michell Sillar (P) SOLICITORS : Corrs Chambers Westgarth (D1) David Hand (S)(D10) CATCHWORDS : TRADE & COMMERCE [15]- Restraint of trade- Consequence of restraint- Contract not void but merely unenforceable between unwilling parties- Not all restrictions on trade constitute "restraints" of trade within doctrine. Adamson v NSW Rugby League Ltd (1991) 31 FCR 242 Adamson v West Perth Football Club Inc (1979) 27 ALR 475 Blackler v New Zealand Rugby Football League Inc [1968] NZLR 547 Boddington v Lawton [1994] ICR 478 CASES CITED : Buckley v Tutty (1971) 125 CLR 353 Howard F Hudson Pty Ltd v Ronague (1972) 126 CLR 449 Kemp v New Zealand Rugby Football League Inc [1989] 3 NZLR 463 Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 Peters (WA) Ltd v Petersville Ltd [2001] HCA 45 Union Royale Belge des Societes de Football Association v Bosman [1996] 1 CMLR 645 DECISION : Interlocutory injunction refused.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate