NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : The Amble Inn Pty Ltd v Ryan [2001] NSWSC 875 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3627/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 14/09/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 September 2001
The Amble Inn Pty Limited (P) PARTIES : John Arnold Ryan (D1) Dianne Isabel Ryan (D2) JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
COUNSEL : R D Wilson (P) D G Charles (D) SOLICITORS : Stacks Family Law Services (P) MBT Lawyers (D) CATCHWORDS : EQUITY [389]- Specific performance- Chattels- Whether unique- Whether Hall v Busst principles apply- How far part performance of contract relevant. VALUATION [5]- Plant in hotel- How to be valued on termination of lease. Dougan v Ley (1946) 71 CLR 142 Doulton Potteries Ltd v Bronotte [1971] 1 NSWLR 591 Hall v Busst (1960) 104 CLR 206 Holt v Cox (1994) 15 ACSR 313 CASES CITED : Kymbo Pty Ltd v Paxton Management Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 792 Legal & General Life of Australia Ltd v A Hudson Pty Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 314 Mordecai v Mordecai (1988) 12 NSWLR 58 Sapir v Sapir (No 2) (1989) 13 Fam LR 362 South Sydney Council v Royal Botanic Gardens [1999] NSWCA 478 Strang Patrick Stevedoring Pty Ltd v James Patrick & Co Pty Ltd (Giles J - 3.3.1993) DECISION : See para 40.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
3627 of 2001 YOUNG CJ IN EQ
Friday 14 September 2001 THE AMBLE INN PTY LTD v JOHN ARNOLD RYAN & ANOR
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate