NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : MALLAH v LUBE MOBILE [2002] NSWCA 209 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40825/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 June 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 July 2002
Mohamad Mallah PARTIES : v Lube Mobile Pty Limited JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Handley JA at 2; Hodgson JA at 15
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Compensation Court LOWER COURT CC 55956/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Burke CCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant - John Wynyard Respondent - J D Hislop QC/C J Callaway SOLICITORS : Appellant - Michael E Bradstreet Respondent - PricewaterhouseCoopers Legal CATCHWORDS : WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT 1987 (NSW) s 4(a) AND s 9A(1) - IN THE COURSE OF EMPLOYMENT - SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTING FACTOR LEGISLATION CITED : Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) Tubemakers of Australia Ltd v Fernandez (1976) 50 ALJR 720 CASES CITED: Australian Gas Light Co v The Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
40825/01 CC55956/99 MEAGHER JA HANDLEY JA HODGSON JA
Wednesday 3 July 2002 MOHAMAD MALLAH v LUBE MOBILE PTY LIMITED
WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT 1987 (NSW) s 4(a) and s 9A(1) – in the course of employment – substantial contributing factor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate