NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Apple Computer Australia Pty Ltd v George Mekrizis & Ors [2002] NSWSC 982 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50054/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 20 September 2002 17 October 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 October 2002
Apple Computer Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Tjipto Hartono (Seventh Defendant) Wing Nin Liu (Thirteenth Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Bergin J
TEF Hughes QC leading CRC Newlinds (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Dr C Birch SC (Seventh Defendant) P Hayes QC leading A Paterson (Thirteenth Defendant) Clayton Utz (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : John A Bush (Seventh Defendant) Wright Pavuk Lawyers (Thirteenth Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Applications to amend Defences and Cross-Claims at conclusion of trial but prior to reservation of judgment - One applicant took no part in the trial until last day - Unjustified allegations against plaintiff and its lawyers of "sharp practice" - Meaning of term "sharp practice" - Evidence given by plaintiff's witness late in trial a suprise to both plaintiff and defendants. Late tender of material as an alternative to reliance upon a Certificate under the guarantee in relation to the amount of the debt alleged under the guarantee. LEGISLATION CITED : Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) CASES CITED : Pentagold Investments Pty Ltd & Anor v Romanos & Anor [2002] ANZ ConvR 132 DECISION : Applications allowed in part - see paragraphs [91] - [94].
- 28 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate