NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : John R Keith Pty Limited v Multiplex Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited & Anor [2002] NSWSC 43 revised - 3/12/2002 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3387/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/01/02, 31/01/02, 1/02/02, 5/02/02, 6/02/02, 7/02/02, 8/02/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 February 2002
John R Keith Pty Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Multiplex Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited (First Defendant) Multiplex Constructions Pty Limited (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
COUNSEL : Mr V Gray (Plaintiff) Mr F Corsaro SC, Ms R Rana (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Gye & Associates Lawyers (Plaintiff) Minter Ellison (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Contract - Formation of contract - Ongoing negotiations - Intention to contract - Masters v Cameron classes - Whether binding and enforceable subcontract formed between the plaintiff and second defendant - If a contract is found, an arbitration clause requires proceedings to be stayed pursuant to s53 (1) of the Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (NSW) - Invitation made by defendant to plaintiff to tender for the design and construction of hydraulics services for the Stadium Australia project - Request to tender contained documents including standard subcontract agreement - Plaintiff submitted tender proposal based on tender documents - Plaintiff issued series of revised proposals modifying both tender price and scope of work - Plaintiff notified as being preferred tenderer - Plaintiff commenced work - Plaintiff sent letter outlining total tender price and scope of work which letter was negotiated, amended and resent by consensus - Plaintiff sent subsequent letter referring to total contract price - Second subcontract agreement sent to plaintiff in terms different from original standard subcontract agreement - Subsequent negotiations ensued between parties over terms of second subcontract agreement - Whether binding contract was formed at any time during ongoing negotiations between parties - No formal signed agreement entered into by parties - Fourth class of Masters v Cameron - Existence of informal contract with further terms to be negotiated and included in a formal document - Relevance of prior negotiation and subsequent conduct - Objective determination of the intention of the parties - Classical theory of contract formation - Relevance of the subjective intention of the parties - Admissibility of post-contractual conduct - Whether parties arrived at a consensus capable of forming a contract - Whether alternative proposal put forth by plaintiff constituted an abandonment of the terms of the original subcontract - Whether second subcontract negotiations supports or mandates inference that parties did not intend to make concluded bargain Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 ss60,70 Supreme Court Rules Air Great Lakes Pty Ltd v KS Easter (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 309 Allen v Carbone (1975) 132 CLR 528 Anaconda Nickel Ltd v Tarmoola Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 22 WAR 101 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v XIVth Commonwealth Games Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 540 Barrier Wharfs Ltd v W Scott Fell & Co Ltd (1908) 5 CLR 647 Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd v G R. Securities Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 622 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (Unreported, 2001, NSWCA, Mason P, Heydon JA and Ipp AJA) Brunninghausen v Galvanics (1999) 46 NSWLR 538 B Seppelt & Sons Ltd v Commissioner for Main Roads (1975) 1 BPR [97011] Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 FAI Traders Insurance Co Ltd v Savoy Plaza Pty Ltd [1993] 2 VR 343 Film Bars Pty Ltd v Pacific Film Laboratories Pty Ltd (1979) 1 BPR 9251 Godecke v Kirwan (1973) 129 CLR 629 Graham Evans Pty Ltd v Stencraft Pty Ltd 16 BCL 335 G R Securities Pty Ltd v Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 63 CASES CITED : Hide & Skin Trading Pty Ltd v Oceanic Meat Traders Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 310 Howard Smith & Co Ltd v Varawa (1907) 5 CLR 68 Heysham Properties Pty Limited v Action Motor Group Pty Limited & Ors (1996) 14 BCL 145 Inland Revenue Commissioners v Raphael [1935] AC 96 Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corp (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 97326 Integrated Computer Services Pty Limited v Digital Equipment Corporation (Australia) Pty Limited (unreported, NSWCA, McHugh, Mahoney and Hope JJA, 23 December 1988) Love & Stewart Ltd v S Instone & Co Ltd (1917) 33 TLR 475 Masters v Cameron 1954 91 CLR 353 Pobije Agencies Pty Ltd v Vinidex Tubemakers Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 105 Raguz v Sullivan (2000) 50 NSWLR 236 Reardon -Smith Line Ltd v Hansen-Tangen [1976] 1 WLR 989 Revenue Commissioners v Raphael [1935] AC 96 at 142 Ryan v Textile Clothing & Footwear Union of Australia [1996] 2 VR 235 Sinclair Scott Co Ltd v Naughton (1929) 43 CLR 310 Telstra Corporation Limited v Australis Media Holdings (1997) 24 ACSR 55 Tern Minerals NL v Kalbara Mining NL (1990) 3 WAR 486 Thompson (1933) 49 CLR DECISION : Short minutes to be brought in.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate