NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 130 A Crim R 545
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Dat Quoc HO [2002] NSWCCA 147 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60589/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 29/4/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 April 2002
PARTIES : Dat Quoc HO (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Hidden J at 67; Bell J at 2
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/21/0122 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Naughton DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : P M Strickland (Appellant) P G Ingram (Crown) SOLICITORS : D J Humphreys (Appellant) S E O'Connor
LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Arcangioli v The Queen (1994) 111 DLR (4th) 48 Brown v The King (1913) 17 CLR 570 Dawson v The Queen (1961) 106 CLR 1 Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193 Green v The Queen (1971) 126 CLR 28 CASES CITED: La Fontaine v The Queen (1976) 136 CLR 62 Regina v Adam [1999] NSWCCA 189 Regina v Power (1996) 87 A Crim R 407 The Queen v Bridgman (1980) 24 SASR 278 Thomas v The Queen (1960) 102 CLR 584 United States v Myers 550 F.2d 1036 (5th sic., 1977) Van Leeuwen v The Queen (1981) 55 ALJR 726 DECISION : Appeal dismissed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60589/01
MEAGHER JA HIDDEN J BELL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate