NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Goulding v Kirby [2003] NSWCA 214 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 September 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 August 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Santow JA at 2 DECISION : (1) The claimants (being the appellants) pay the opponent's (being the respondent's) costs of the summons for leave to appeal (CA 40728/02) on a party/party basis, and in addition pay the costs of the appeal (CA 41078/01) including the hearing on 23 September 2002 and the appearance on 9 December 2002, but not including the costs in (2) below; and (2) The opponent (being the respondent) pay so much of the claimants' (being the appellants') costs of the appeal (CA 41078/01) as is limited to the preparation of the red and orange books and pay the claimants' (Gouldings') costs of and incidental to the Notice of Motion filed on 10 July 2002; (3) No order is made as to costs pertaining to the submissions concerning costs.
CATCHWORDS : COSTS - leave to appeal refused - appeal treated as incompetent - in the interim between the hearing and the determining of costs one of the original judges resigned from the Court of Appeal - s45AA consent given by the parties to the two remaining Judges of Appeal determining the matter - written submissions on costs - respondents challenged the competency of the appeal - letter of offer of 29 July 2002 referred to not claiming costs on the appeal but silent on costs of the application for leave to appeal - letter came too late to justify indemnity costs - competency of appeal challenged outside the time allowed pursuant to Pt 51 r27 SCR - respondent in absence of any order otherwise therefore disentitled to any costs when appeal treated as incompetent whether Court should make an order otherwise ordering - appellants' material for appeal prepared prior to challenge - duplication in need for preparation of material for concurrent application for leave to appeal and appeal. LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act s45AA Supreme Court Rules Pt 51 r27 Carolan v AMF Bowley Pty Ltd t/as Bennetts Bowling Green (NSWCA, 16 November 1995, unreported) CASES CITED : Falamaki v Wollongong City Council [2001] NSWCA 55 Kassem v Colonial Mutual General Insurance Co Ltd [2001] NSWCA 38 PARTIES : Leonard Charles GOULDING Ruth GOULDING (Appellants) Robert Raymond KIRBY (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41078/01; 40728/02 COUNSEL : A Ogborne (Appellants) J Coombs, QC/ G Ellis (Respondent) SOLICITORS : The Bruce Stewart Commercial Practice (Appellants) Colin Biggers & Paisley (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate