NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : GRIFFIN David James v SOGELEASE AUSTRALIA LIMITED & ORS [2002] NSWCA 421 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41105/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 December 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 December 2002
PARTIES : DAVID JAMES GRIFFIN V SOGELEASE AUSTRALIA LIMITED & ORS JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA; Ipp JA; Davies AJA
Claimant: Mr A W Street SC Mr G T Wembler Opponent/Resp: 1st: G.C.Lindsay SC COUNSEL : Opponent: 2nd: R. Benjamin (Sol) (Submitting Appearance) Opponents,3rd,4th,5th,7th: J McNamara (Sol) Opponent: 8th: N Manousiridis
Claimant/App: North & Badgery SOLICITORS : Opponent/Resp: 1st: Aper Alderman Lawyers Opponent/Resp: 2nd: R. Benjamin (Sol) (Submitting Appearance) Opponents/Resp: 3rd,4th,5th,7th: Corrs Chambers Westgarth CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - stay whether civil proceedings should be stayed when criminal prosecution likely LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 - s.84 Halabi v Westpac Banking Corp (1989) 17 NSWLR 26 PT Garuda Indonesia Pty Ltd v Grellman (1994) 48 FCR 252 Jefferson Limited v Bhetcha [1979] 1 WLR 898 CASES CITED: Yuill v Spedley Securities Limited (in Liq) [1992] 8 ACSR 272 McMahon v Gould (1982) 7 ACLR SC (NSW) 202 Rochfort v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1972] 1 NSWLR 16 Cameron's Unit Services Pty Ltd v Whelpton & Assoc Pty Ltd (1984) 59 ALR 754 DECISION : See paragraph 20. [ORDERS MADE 19 DECEMBER 2002, REASONS DATED 20 DECEMBER 2002]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate