NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : State of NSW v Smith Council of Shire of Kyogle v Smith [2003] NSWCA 115 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 May 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 May 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Santow JA; Tobias JA DECISION : Both summonses dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS : LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - extension of the limitation period - whether cause of action - no question of principle LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act District Court Act CASES CITED : House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 PARTIES : State of New South Wales v Geoffrey Robert Smith & Ors Council of Shire of Kyogle v Geoffrey Robert Smith & Anor FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40121/02; 40122/02 For Council: R G Gambi COUNSEL : For State: C E Adamson For Smith & Ors: J E Rowe/J A Darvall SOLICITORS : For Council and State: I V Knight, Crown Solicitor For Smith & Ors: Paul Denmeade & Co, Lismore
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 3891/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sidis DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
40122/02 40121/02 DC 3891/00 HANDLEY JA SANTOW JA TOBIAS JA
12 May 2003 COUNCIL OF THE SHIRE OF KYOGLE v GEOFFREY ROBERT SMITH & ANOR STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES v GEOFFREY ROBERT SMITH & ORS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate