NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 131 A Crim R 390
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v. EADE [2002] NSWCCA 257 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60438/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 April 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 June 2002
PARTIES : Regina - respondent Wayne James Eade - appellant JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Hidden J at 57; Smart AJ at 58
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/11/0010 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Kinchington DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr. T. Game SC with Mr. M.R. Bromwich for appellant Mr. Barrett for respondent SOLICITORS : Andrews Solicitors for appellant S.E. O'Connor for respondent CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - EVIDENCE - admissibility of evidence of conversation obtained contrary to Listening Devices Act 1984 - Whether transcript of evidence before Royal Commission was evidence of the conversation - CRIMINAL LAW - prohibited drugs - incitement to supply - Whether tehre can be incitement to supply to oneself Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Listening Devices Act 1984 Royal Commission (Police Service) Act 1994 Castle v. Olsen (1985) 3 NSWLR 26 R v. Assistant Recorder of Kingston-upon-Hull; Ex parte Morgan [1969] 2 QB 58 CASES CITED: R v. Downey (1992) 66 ACrimR 1 R v. Eade (2000) 118 ACrimR 449 R v. Massie (1993) 103 ACrimR 551 Young v. Cassells (1914) 33 NZLR 852 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60438/01 99/11/0010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate