NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : St Hilliers Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Peter Kelly Flooring Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 270 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5858/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 April 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 April 2002
PARTIES : St Hilliers Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd Peter Kelly Flooring Pty Ltd JUDGMENT OF : Davies AJ at 1
COUNSEL : Mr P J Bambagiotti for the Plaintiff Mr C J Millard for the Defendant SOLICITORS : O'Hara & Company Solicitors & Attorneys for the Plaintiff Business Law Office Solicitors & Notaries for the Defendant CATCHWORDS : Contract - offer of settlement - misunderstanding of terms by one party - whether unilateral unexpressed reservation vitiates agreement CASES CITED : Taylor v Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422 DECISION : See paragraphs 21 and 24 of the judgment.
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
Davies AJ
Friday, 5 April 2002
5858 / 01 St Hilliers Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Peter Kelly Flooring Pty Ltd Judgment 1 His Honour: These proceedings seek a declaration that proceedings in the District Court of New South Wales were settled between the parties on 2 April 2001. 2 Those proceedings had been brought by Peter Kelly Flooring Pty Ltd as subcontractor against a contractor, St Hilliers Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd, in respect of work done and materials provided at the Chesalon Nursing Home, Woonona. 3 Peter Kelly Flooring Pty Ltd had sued for the balance of the contract price owing, a sum of $181,639.94. That sum included a retention sum of $7,500, which may not at the time have been strictly payable, for a provision of the contract provided for retention for a period of time against the contingency that problems in the work done might arise. 4 Negotiations were carried on between the solicitors for the parties with a view to achieving a settlement and certain payments were made. A letter from the solicitors for Peter Kelly Flooring of 3 July 2000 made an offer to settle for $172,000, subject to release of retention deposits. 5 There was a response by the solicitors for St Hilliers Constructions referring to moneys paid and offering a further sum, that amount to include the retention moneys in the sum of $7,450, which I assume was the total of the retention moneys then outstanding. 6 A further letter from the solicitors for Peter Kelly Flooring of 1 August 2000 referred again to payments and the outstanding balance. It referred to the claim for $181,639.94, the balance outstanding of which was then said to be $48,666.44. 7 On 12 March 2001 the solicitors for Peter Kelly Flooring wrote to say that their client would settle the action by the payment to it of $28,500 plus $4,500. The total of those sums was $33,000. 8 Subsequent to that letter, there was an offer by the solicitors for St Hilliers Constructions to pay $31,500 and that was countered by a telephone offer made by the solicitor for Peter Kelly Flooring to accept the sum of $32,500. According to the affidavit of the solicitor for St Hilliers Constructions, the solicitor for Peter Kelly Flooring, Mr Moffatt, said: "My client will accept the sum of $32,500 and that is the last offer we will make."
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate