NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Carter v Stapleton [2002] NSWSC 695 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4531/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 31/07/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 August 2002
PARTIES : Deborah Lyndon Carter (Plaintiff) James Stapleton (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Acting Master Berecry at 1
COUNSEL : MS Willmott (Plaintiff) PT Taylor (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Eric Butler Solicitors ( Plaintiff) Taylor & Whitty Solicitors (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : dependency - member of same household - whether de facto relationship had existed - nature of relationship post de facto relationship - s 32 family Provision Act - admissibility of oral statements made by deceased LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Property (Relationships) Act (1984) NSW Roy v Sturgeon (1986) 11 NSWLR 454 CASES CITED : Markulin v Drew (1993) DFC 95-40 Re Fulop (deceased) (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 DECISION : 1.Provision is to be made out of the deceased's estate for the plaintiff in the sum of $40,000; 2.Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs on a party party basis; 3.Defendant's costs to be paid out of the estate on an indemnity basis.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
Acting Master Berecry
9 August 2002
4531/00 Deborah Lyndon Carter v James Stapleton JUDGMENT 1 Master: On 8 November 2000, Deborah Lyndon Carter ("the plaintiff") commenced proceedings seeking an order pursuant to s 7 of the Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) ("the Act"), for provision to be made for her maintenance, education and advancement in life out of the estate of the late Peta (also known as Peter) John Stapleton ("the deceased"). The deceased died between 2 and 3 August 1999, therefore the application is brought within time. The deceased did not make a will, and letters of administration were granted to the defendants on 7 March 2001. The estate consisted of realty at Spring Hill and two credit union accounts. For the purposes of probate, the value of the estate was $148,039.81. The current value of the estate is approximately $181,000.00.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate