NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Sotir Trpenoski v BHP Flat Products [2003] NSWCA 176 HEARING DATE(S) : 1 July 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 July 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Santow JA at 2; Tobias JA at 3 DECISION : Appeal refused; Summons for leave dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : Application for leave to appeal and appeal - Workers Compensation Act 1987 - Proceedings for damages for injury sustained in course of employment - No Statement of Claim filed when Notice of Motion filed - Whether Notice of Motion for leave to commence proceedings sufficient - ND Workers Compensation Act 1987, s151D(2) Workers Compensation Legislation Further Amendment Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED : District Court Act 1973, s44(1)(e) District Court Rules, Pt 1 r4(1), Pt 5 r4, s53, div 2 pt 5 Trade Marks Act 1905 Whisprun v Sams & Ors (2002) NSWCA 394 Cheney v Spurner (1928) CASES CITED : Forrest v Kelly (1991) Keystone Knitting Mills Trademark (1929) Jol v State of New South Wales (1998) Dandashli v Dandashli (unreported) PARTIES : Sotir Trpensoki BHP Flat Products FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41123/03 COUNSEL : Cl - Mr Porthouse O - Mr J D Hislop QC / Mr N E Chen SOLICITORS : Cl - Lough Wells Duncan - Wollongong O - Sparke Helmore
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 814/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Phelan J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 41123/03
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate