NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Bylander v Multilink [2002] NSWCA 16 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40741/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/02/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 February 2002
Bylander International Consortium (Australia) Pty Limited ACN 079 739 736 (First Appellant) Thambiappah Satchithanantham (Second Appellant) PARTIES : Hemalathasothy Ranjini Satchithanantham (Third Appellant) Multilink Investments Pty Limited ACN 060 200 526 (First Respondent) Devjani Mohanty as representative of Arvind Mohanty (Second Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Mason P; Santow JA; Ipp AJA
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 9139/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Boyd-Boland ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : J Patel (Appellant) J A Trebeck (Respondents) SOLICITORS : -- (Appellant) Bush Burke & Co (Respondents) CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - Decision in short form under s45(4) of Supreme Court Act - No appealable error - Principles applicable where findings of trial judge in substantial part based on credibility - Oral submissions of further grounds not properly pleaded or properly articulated in grounds of appeal. D LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act s45(4) CASES CITED: Damberg v Damberg [2001] NSWCA 87 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
- 4 -IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40741/00 DC 9139/98 MASON P SANTOW JA IPP AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate