NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 43 ACSR 436
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Whitton v Konemann Australia [2002] NSWSC 1137 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10584/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 August 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 November 2002
PARTIES : Robert Whitton as liquidator of Chittagong Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (A) Konemann Australia Pty Ltd (R) JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
COUNSEL : Mr J T Johnson (A) No appearance for Respondent SOLICITORS : Access Business Lawyers, Wollongong (A) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - unfair preferences - subjective and objective ingredients of defence in s 588FG(2) - ingredients of running account under s 588FA(3) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 588FA, 588FE, 588FF, 588FG LEGISLATION CITED : Justices Act 1902 (NSW) ss 101-115 Local Courts (Civil Claims) Act 1970 (NSW) s 69 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Australian Gaslight Company v Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR(NSW) 126 Carr v Neill [1999] NSWSC 1263 Mahony v Industrial Registrar of New South Wales (1986) 8 NSWLR 1 CASES CITED : Poricanin v Australian Consolidated Industries Ltd (1979) 2 NSWLR 417 Queensland Bacon Pty Ltd v Rees (1966) 115 CLR 266 Re Ermayne Pty Ltd; Sims v Tech Holdings Pty Ltd (1999) 30 ACSR 330 Sims v Calcast Pty Ltd (1998) 71 SASR 142 Sutherland v Eurolinx Pty Ltd (2001) 37 ACSR 477 DECISION : See under heading "Conclusion"
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate