NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Cropley v Cropley (No 2) [2002] NSWSC 818 CURRENT JURISDICTION: (1) Equity Division - Probate List (2) Equity Division - FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 100191/01; 4029/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/05/02, 27/06/02, 04/07/02, 31/07/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 September 2002
(1) Elizabeth Anne Cropley - Plaintiff Richard Oswald Cropley - Defendant PARTIES : (2) Geoffrey David Cropley - Plaintiff Elizabeth Anne Cropley - Defendant
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
(1) Mr P J Blackburn-Hart - Plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr P Hallen SC - Defendant (2) Mr P Hallen SC - Plaintiff Mr P J Blackburn-Hart - Defendant (1) Teece Hodgson & Ward - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Holding Redlich - Defendant (2) Holding Redlich - Plaintiff Teece Hodgson & Ward - Defendant CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - family provision - costs LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982 CASES CITED : Fiorentini v O'Neil (unreported, NSWCA, 4 December 1998) DECISION : See paragraphs 16 and 17
- 12 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BARRETT J
TUESDAY, 10 SEPTEMBER 2002
100191/01 – ELIZABETH ANNE CROPLEY v RICHARD OSWALD CROPLEY & ORS – ESTATE OF DAVID OSWALD CROPLEY (NO 2) 4029/01 – GEOFFREY DAVID CROPLEY v ELIZABETH ANNE CROPLEY – ESTATE OF DAVID OSWALD CROPLEY (NO 2) JUDGMENT
1 The outcome of both these proceedings, in accordance with judgment delivered by me on 26 April 2002 (Cropley v Cropley [2002] NSWSC 349), was as follows:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate