NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : SCHOELLER AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (in liquidation) & Anor v GARRY LISSA & ORS [2002] NSWSC 790 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3310/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/08/2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 September 2002
PARTIES : Schoeller Australia Pty Ltd & Anor v Garry Aaron LISSA & Ors JUDGMENT OF : Acting Master Berecry at 1
Mr J.K. Chippindall - Plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr P. Dowdy - 1st Defendant Mr A. Justice - 2nd Defendant Mr N. Cotman SC - 3rd Defendant M.D. Nikolaidis & Co - Plaintiff Deacons - 1st Defendant SOLICITORS : Mr Tim Weissel - 2nd Defendant MBP Legal McCrohon Bergseng Partners - 3rd Defendant CATCHWORDS : Pt 31 Supreme Court Rules - matters for consideration - is the preliminary question critical to disposition - likelihood of real savings - multi defendants - are there discrete issues? LEGISLATION CITED : ss 588M & 588H of the Corporations Law Pt 31 r2 of the Supreme Court Rules Everett v Ribbands [1952] 2 QB 206 at 198 CASES CITED : Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Herbert Smith & Co & Ors (1969) 1 Ch 93 at 98 Printing and Kindred Industries Union of Australia v Clark (unreported; Needham J, 17 September 1976) CBS Productions Pty Ltd v O'Neill (1985) 1 NSWLR 601 at 606 DECISION : 1. Notice of Motion be dismissed.; 2. The third defendant pay the costs of the plaintiff and the first defendant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
ACTING MASTER BERECRY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate