NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 43 ACSR 470 (2003) 21 ACLC 94
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hill v Smithfield Service Centre [2002] NSWSC 999 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2808/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 21 October 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 October 2002
PARTIES : Rodney McKay Sutherland (A) Lemi Hill (aka Lambros Hilellis) (P/R) JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
COUNSEL : Mr F Gleeson (A) Mr G McDonald (P/R) SOLICITORS : Ernst & Young Law (A) Clinch Neville Long (P/R) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - examination summons - "eligible applicant" - whether eligible applicant authorised by ASIC continues to have standing if bankruptcy intervenes between authorisation and commencement of examination proceeding - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - abuse of process - whether plaintiff in examination proceeding abuses process by continuing after bankruptcy LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 596A Cummings v Claremont Petroleum NL (1996) 185 CLR 124 Daemar v Industrial Commission of New South Wales (1988) 12 NSWLR 45 Fuller v Beach Petroleum NL (1993) 43 FCR 60 Heath v Tang [1993] 1 WLR 1421 CASES CITED : Karounos v Official Trustee (1988) 80 ALR 66 Re Burton; Wily v Burton (1994) 126 ALR 557 Re Excel Finance Corp Ltd (1994) 52 FCR 69 Re Network Welding Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2001] NSWSC 809 Re Scharrer; ex parte Tilly (1888) 20 QBD 518 Want v Moss (1889) 10 LR (NSW) 274 DECISION : Examination summons discharged
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate