NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 130 A Crim R 417
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Baker [2002] NSWCCA 184 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60474/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 20/05/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 June 2002
PARTIES : Regina v Allan Baker JUDGMENT OF : Ipp AJA at 1; Dunford J at 109; Bergin J at 110
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : L97/012 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Greg James J OFFICER :
P R Zahra SC/A P Cook (Appellant) COUNSEL : M G Sexton SC/B K Baker (Attorney General (NSW)) R A Hulme (Crown) SOLICITORS : Brezniak Neil-Smith & Co (Appellant) S E O'Connor (Crown) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against refusal to have minimum and additional terms determined to replace life sentence - Sentencing Act 1989 s 13A(4) - whether judge erred in deciding that the appellant was eligible to make an application under the Act - whether the Judge applied wrong test for establishing "special reasons" pursuant to s 13A(3A) - meaning of "special reasons" - whether Sentencing Legislation Further Amendment Act 1997 No 6 invalidly vests functions in the Court incompatible with the exercise of Commonwealth judicial power by that Court - whether "special reasons" are too difficult to establish - whether Act usurps judicial power - whether legislation covering a small class of people is invalid - principles. Sentencing Act 1989 Sentencing Legislation Further Amendment Act 1997 No 6 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Kalajzich (1997) 94 A Crim R 41 United Mexican States v Cabal (2001) 75 ALJR 1663 O'Hare v DPP (2000) NSWSC 430 B v Gould and DPP (1993) 67 A Crim R 297 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534 Kable v Director of Public Prosecututions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51 CASES CITED: R v Baker (NSWCCA, unreported, 23 May 1994) Nicholas v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 173 Chester v R (1988) 165 CLR 611 R v Moffatt [1998] 2 V.R. 229 Polyukhovich v The Commonwealth (1991) 172 CLR 501 Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455 Liyanage v The Queen (1967) 1 AC 259 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate