NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 56 NSWLR 51 (2003) Aust Torts Reports 81-689
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Babcock International Limited v Babcock Australia Limited & Eraring Energy; Babcock Australia Limited v Eraring Energy & Babcock International Limited [2003] NSWCA 6 HEARING DATE(S) : 09/12/02, 10/12/02,11/12/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 February 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Heydon JA at 2; Ipp JA at 3 DECISION : See paragraphs 159 to 166
CATCHWORDS : TORT - Duty of care of designers of works, suppliers, contractors and employers to employees exposed to asbestos - Contribution proceedings under s 5 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 - Claim for damages by one joint tortfeasor in direct action for damages against other joint tortfeasor for amount first tortfeasor required by contribution proceedings to pay plaintiff - Pure economic loss - Damages representing the costs incurred in defending a third party claim - Apportionment of liability under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 - Knowledge of statutory corporations - Right of appeal from the Dust Diseases Tribunal. D Electricity Commission Act 1950, ss 5(1)(b), 6(1), 7 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946, s 5 LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965, s 9 Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989, ss 25B(1), 32(1) Hydro-Electric Commission Act 1944 (Tas) Factory and Work Shop Act 1901 (UK), s 79 Ambulance Service of New South Wales v Daniel [2000] NSWCA 116 Azzopardi v Tasman UEV Industries Limited (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 CSR Limited v Wren (1997) 44 NSWLR 463 Daniels v Anderson (1995) 37 NSWLR 438 Dein v Wentworth Goldfield Proprietary Company (1899) 15 WN(NSW) Doyle v Pick and Rickwood [1965] WAR 95 Electricity Commission of New South Wales v Australian United Press Limited (1954) 55 SR(NSW) 118 Hadley v Baxendale 9 Exch 341 Hammond and Company v Bussey (1887) 20 QBD 79 HMS Truculent: The Admiralty v The Divina (Owners) [1951] 2 All ER 968 John Pfeiffer Pty Limited v Canny (1981) 148 CLR 218 Launceston Corporation v The Hydro-Electric Commission (1959) 100 CLR 654 Leotta v Public Transport Commission (NSW) (1976) 9 ALR 437 CASES CITED : Maloney v Commissioner for Railays (1978) 18 ALR 147 Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Limited v Securities Commission [1995] 2 AC 500 Osman v J Ralph Moss Limited [1970] 1 Lloyds Rep 313 (CA) Perre v Apand Pty Limitd (1999) 198 CLR 180 Ronneberg v Falkland Islands Company (1864) 17 CB(NS) 1 Smorgon v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited: Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Smorgon (1976) 134 CLR 475 State Authority Superannuation Board v Commissioner of State Taxation (WA) (1996) 189 CLR 253 Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424 The Wallsend [1907] P 302 Tamlin v Hannaford [1950] 1 KB 18 Tindall v Bell (1843) 11 M & W 228 Underwriters at Lloyds v Ellis (unreported, 25 February 1998, NSWCA) Watt v Bretag (1982) 56 ALJR 760 Western Australia v Watson [1990] WAR 248 PARTIES : Babcock International Limited (Appellant) v Babcock Australia Limited (1st Respondent) and Eraring Energy (2nd Respondent) Babcock Australia Limited (Appellant) v Eraring Energy (1st Respondent) & Babcock International Limited (2nd Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40031/02; 40627/01 T F Bathurst QC/ M C L Dicker (Appellant: CA 40031/01; Second Respondent:CA 40627/01) COUNSEL : G Inatey SC/ D T Miller (Appellant: CA 40627/01; 1st Respondent: CA 40031/01) B M J Toomey QC/J A Gracie/T Moisidis (2nd Respondent: CA 40627/01) Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Appellant: CA 40031/02; 2nd Respondent: CA 40627/01) SOLICITORS : Moray & Agnew (Appellant: CA 40627/01; 1st Respondent: CA 40031/02) Goldrick Farrell Mullan (2nd Respondent: CA 40031/02; 1st Respondent: CA 40627/01)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate