NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Reliance Financial Services Pty Ltd v Baddock [2002] NSWSC 857 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3858/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 02/09/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 September 2002
Reliance Financial Sevices Pty Ltd (P1) Sam Peter Cassaniti (P2) PARTIES : Ronald William Ross Baddock (D1) Richard Albert Dabbs (D2) John Campbell Hawkins (D3) Inhold Pty Ltd (D4) JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
R Parsons (P) COUNSEL : J Kelly SC and P Lowe (D1 & 2) J T Johnson (D3) T Duggan (D4) Stoikovich Banfield Macri (P) Bradfield Anderson (D1 & 2) SOLICITORS : English Kearns (D3) Abadee Dresdner & Freeman (D4)
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT [122]- Discharge by agreement- Ambit- Difference from rescission- Difference from discharge by performance. Conveyancing Act 1919, s 37A LEGISLATION CITED : Duties Act 1997, ss 205, 211, 304 Real Property Act 1900, s 43A Baird v BCE Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 40 NSWLR 374 Barry v Heider (1914) 19 CLR 197 Cunliffe v Harrison (1851) 6 Ex 903; 155 ER 813 CASES CITED : Dent v Moore (1919) 26 CLR 316 Knight Sugar Co Ltd v Alberta Railway & Irrigation Co [1938] 1 All ER 266 Montgomery v Continental Bags (NZ) Ltd [1972] NZLR 884 Twidale v Bradley [1990] 2 Qd R 464 West v Read (1913) 13 SR (NSW) 575 DECISION : See paras 47-52.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate