NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 132 A Crim R 482
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Boundy [2002] NSWCCA 319 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60069/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 July 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 August 2002
PARTIES : Regina v Steven Walter Boundy JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Hulme J at 2; Smart AJ at 51
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/51/0150 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Hosking DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : (A/C) P Barrett (R) G Wendler SOLICITORS : (A/C) S E O'Connor (R) John D Weller CATCHWORDS : Sentencing - supply of commercial quantity of cannabis - actual saleable quantity less but still serious offence - sentence manifestly inadequate - effect of delay since sentencing on re-sentencing LEGISLATION CITED : Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act R v Blanco (unrep) CCA 22/10/78 R v Clark (unrep) CCA 15/3/90 Rex v Geddes (1936) 36 SR 554 at 556 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 at 354 R v Rushby (1977) 1 NSWLR 594 at 597-598 CASES CITED: R v Swann (unrep) CCA 17/7/92 R v Burnett & Ors (1996) 85 A Crim R 76 R v Peel (1971) 1 NSWLR 247 at 262 Postiglione v R (1996-97) 189 CLR 295 at 341 R v Doan (2000) 50 NSWLR 115 AT 124 R v Parsons & Poore [2002] NSWCCA 296 DECISION : See para 86
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60069/2002 MASON P HULME J SMART AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate