NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : MISTRAL INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD (Formerly known as Ringgrip Pty Ltd) v POLSTEAD PTY LTD [2002] NSWCA 321 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41031/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 August 2002, 27 August 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 October 2002
PARTIES : Mistral International Pty Ltd - Appellant Polstead Pty Ltd - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Sheller JA at 2; Beazley JA at 124
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 5527/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Naughton DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : J T Gleeson SC/S J Stanton - Appellant D Cassidy QC/C K Stewart/N Potts - Respondent SOLICITORS : Aitken McLachlan & Thorpe - Appellant Dominic David Stamfords - Respondent CATCHWORDS : SALE OF GOODS - merchantable quality - rejection of expert evidence - insufficient reasons given for rejection of evidence - apprehension of bias - new trial ordered LEGISLATION CITED : Sale of Goods Act 1923 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 Moylan v Nutrasweet Company [2000] NSWCA 337 Australian Knitting Mills Limited & Anor v Grant (1933) 50 CLR 387 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Limited [1936] AC 85 CASES CITED: George Wills & Co Limited v Davids Pty Ltd (1957) 98 CLR 77 Lawry v West (1947) 73 CLR 289 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Set aside the judgment and orders made by Judge Naughton on 14 December 2000; 3. Direct a new trial before a Judge of the District Court other than Judge Naughton; 4. The costs of the first trial to be in the discretion of the Judge hearing the new trial; 5. The respondent to pay the appellant's costs of this appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate