NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : REGINA v. HALL & ORS [2001] NSWSC 827 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Criminal FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70008/01; 70202/01; 70031/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 4/9/01; 6/9/01; 10/9/01; 17/9/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 September 2001
REGINA v. HALL, Ernest William PARTIES : REGINA v. SMITH, Donna Ann REGINA v. GARDENER, George William JUDGMENT OF : Greg James J at 1
Crown: J. Kiely, SC. COUNSEL : Hall: J. Spencer Smith: S. Kluss Gardener: M. Paish Crown: S.E. O'Connor SOLICITORS : Hall: T.A. Murphy Smith: T.A. Murphy Gardener: R.F. Bergagnin & Co. CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - evidence - recorded conversations - quality of recording such that what was said cannot reliably be determined - recordings inadmissible - consideration of concept of admissions - relevance - discretion to admit and reject. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Uniform Evidence Law, Odgers (4th ed.) Johns (1980) 143 CLR 108 Butera v. DPP (1987) 164 CLR 180 Eastman (1997) 158 ALR 107 Cassar & Sleiman (No. 17) [1999] NSWSC 436 Smith [2001] HCA 50 CASES CITED : Murrell [2001] NSWCCA 179 Smith (1987) 7 NSWLR 444 Brownlowe (1987) 7 NSWLR 461 Bulejcik (1996) 1 CLR 315 Henshaw (1988) VR 362 Jones (1989) 41 A. Crim. R. 1 DECISION : The prosecution of each of the three accused for the offences charged on the indictment presently preferred, is permanently stayed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate