NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Zammit v Auto Team P/L [2002] NSWCA 196 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40835 of 2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 03/04/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 June 2002
Bill Zammit PARTIES : v Auto Team Pty Ltd JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Handley JA at 16; Powell JA at 17
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 8345 of 1998 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Armitage DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant: Mr D E Baran Respondent: Mr P Deakin QC SOLICITORS : Appellant: Stephen Smart & Associates Respondent: Abbot Tout CATCHWORDS : Personal Injury - failure to provide adequate supervision - appeal dismissed with costs. DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40835 of 2000 DC 8345 of 1998
MEAGHER JA HANDLEY JA POWELL JA
Thursday, 27 June 2002 ZAMMIT v AUTO TEAM PTY LTD FACTS
The appellant, Mr Zammit, a mechanic, was injured whilst carrying out alterations on a Nissan Pathfinder at the respondent's premises, Auto Team Pty Ltd. The trial judge awarded a verdict in favour of the respondent as a result of the contradictory factual narratives submitted in evidence by the appellant and his witnesses.
On appeal, the appellant maintained that the description of the incident contained in the statement of claim bore no relation to the truth and attempted to reformulate his case by contending that the respondent failed to provide adequate supervision.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate