NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Tonkiss v Graham (No2); Estate Late Marjorie Bobs Thompson [2002] NSWSC 1093 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Probate List FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 118541/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 November 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 November 2002
David James Tonkiss (First Plaintiff) Lorraine Gay Tonkiss (Second Plaintiff) Carolyn Graham (First Defendant) Margaret Kathleen Horan (Second Defendant) Hamish Murdoch Angus McLean (Third Defendant) PARTIES : Jessie Eleanor Tamzin McLean (Fourth Defendant) Stephen David Tonkiss (Fifth Defendant) Samantha Jane Tonkiss (Sixth Defendant) Sue McKinnon Horton (Seventh Defendant) Stuart McKinnon Horton (Eighth Defendant) Robert McKinnon Horton (Ninth Defendant) Peter Douglas George Horton (Tenth Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
P Hallen SC (P) COUNSEL : D Davies SC (D1-4 and D7-10) D Legg, Solicitor (D6) Teece, Hodgson & Ward (P) Shaw McDonald (D1-4) SOLICITORS : Burridge & Legg (D6) Michael H Roberts & Associates (D7-9) Bilbie Dan (D10) CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION - WILLS PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION - interested witness - appropriate costs order - PROCEDURE - costs - probate suit - gift to interested witness LEGISLATION CITED : Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898 CASES CITED : Re: Hodges; Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698 DECISION : Costs of next of kin opposing grant of probate ordered paid from share of beneficiary whose spouse witnessed Will
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate