NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : THOS COOK v KUMARI [2002] NSWCA 141 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40882/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 May 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 May 2002
THOMAS COOK LIMITED PARTIES : v KAMLESH KUMARI JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Sheller JA at 19; Pearlman AJA at 20
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 786/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Certoma ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant - J W Stevenson Respondent - R McColl SC/M Campbell SOLICITORS : Appellant - Gadens Respondent - Dominic David Stamfords CATCHWORDS : BANKING - TRAVELLERS' CHEQUES - LOSS OR THEFT - PURCHASE AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR REFUND OF CHEQUES LOST OR STOLEN - CONDITION OF REFUND THAT PURCHASER HAD SAFEGUARDED CHEQUES AS THE PURCHASER WOULD A SIMILAR AMOUNT OF HER OWN CASH - WHETHER PURCHASER BREACHED THAT CONDITION Goodwin v Robarts (1875) LR 10 Ex 337 CASES CITED: Glynn v Margetson & Co [1893] AC 351 Braithwaite v Thomas Cook Cheques Ltd [1989] QB 553 El Awadi v Bank of Credit SA Ltd [1990] 1 QB 606 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
40882/01 DC 786/00 HANDLEY JA SHELLER JA PEARLMAN AJA
21 May 2002 THOMAS COOK LIMITED v KAMLESH KUMARI
BANKING – travellers' CHEQUES – loss or theft – purchase agreement providing for refund of cheques lost or stolen –condition of refund that purchaser had safeguarded cheques as the purchaser would a similar amount of her own cash – whether purchaser breached that condition
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate