NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Sung Eun PARK [2003] NSWCCA 203 revised - 24/07/2003 HEARING DATE(S) : 25/06/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 July 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Ipp JA at 1; Buddin J at 2; Shaw J at 3 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - conviction appeal - whether reasonable hypothesis inconsistent with guilt - directions on propensity - directions on silence - fresh evidence Azzopardi v The Queen (2001) 205 CLR 50; Barca v The Queen (1975) 133 CLR 82; BRS v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 275; Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555; Gilbert v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 414; Palmer v The Queen [1971] AC 814; CASES CITED : Pemble v The Queen (1971) 124 CLR 107; R v Clarke (1995) 78 A Crim R 226; R v Dinnick (1909) 3 Cr App R 77; R v Dudko [2002] NSWCCA 336; R v Elfar [2000] NSWCCA 225; R v Tillman [1962] Crim LR 261; RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620; Van dan Hoek v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 158; PARTIES : Regina (NSW) Sun Eun Park - Appellant FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60581/00 COUNSEL : D Frearson - Crown P Byrne, SC with G Bashir - Appellant SOLICITORS : S O'Connor - Crown G Goold Solicitors - Appellant
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 70085/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sperling J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60581 of 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate