NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v SMR [2002] NSWCCA 258 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60806/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 May 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 July 2002
PARTIES : Regina v SMR JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Hidden J at 2; Carruthers AJ at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/71/0070 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Her Honour Judge Latham OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant - S.J. Odgers SC / Tanzareth Crown - W.G. Dawe QC SOLICITORS : Appellant - D.J. Humphreys Crown - S.E. O'Connor CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - appeal against conviction - sexual assaults - cogency of fingerprint evidence - whether Longman direction required - whether fresh evidence by independent fingerprint expert should be admitted. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 ss 61J, 61J(1), 61L, 61N(2), 61P Azzopardi v The Queen (2001) 75 ALJR 931 Bromley v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 315 Carr v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 314 Craig v The King (1933) 49 CLR 429 Gallagher v The Queen (1985-86) 160 CLR 371 Green v The King (1939) 61 CLR 167 Jago v District Court (NSW) (1989) 168 CLR 23 CASES CITED: Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 Moreshead v Police [1999] SASC 162 (16/4/99) Parker v The King (1912) 14 CLR 681 R v Baartman [2000] NSWCCA 298 R v Castleton (1909) 3 Cr App R 74 R v McIntee (1985) 38 SASR 432 R v Peel (1999) 2 Qd R 400 R v Richards [2002] NSWCCA 38 Weissensteiner v the Queen (1993) 178 CLR 217 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate