NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : ROZYNSKI v. PAROLE BOARD OF NSW [2003] NSWCCA 214 HEARING DATE(S) : Wednesday 18 June 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 July 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Simpson J at 2; Greg James J at 3 DECISION : Application dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Whether information given to the Parole Board was false, misleading or irrelevant LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Naudi [2003] NSWCCA 160 CASES CITED : McPherson v. Offenders Review Board (1991) 23 NSWLR 61 LMS v. Parole Board [1999] NSWCCA 371 Rozynski [2001] NSWCCA 257 PARTIES : ROZYNSKI, Glen Alan James v. PAROLE BOARD OF NEW SOUTH WALES FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA No. 60089 of 2003 COUNSEL : App: In person Resp: Ms. H. Roberts SOLICITORS : Resp: I.V. Knight
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 60089 of 2003
HODGSON, JA. SIMPSON, J. GREG JAMES, J.
TUESDAY 29 JULY 2003 GLEN ALAN JAMES ROZYNSKI v. PAROLE BOARD OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Judgment
1 HODGSON, JA: I agree with Greg James, J. 2 SIMPSON, J: I agree with Greg James, J. 3 GREG JAMES, J: On 18 June 2003 this matter was heard. On that same day was also heard a similar application of Vincent Naudi on which judgment was pronounced on 30 June 2003 (Naudi v. Parole Board of New South Wales reported as Regina v. Naudi [2003] NSWCCA 160).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate