NSW Caselaw
(2001) 19 ACLC 1622 Reported Decision : [2001] NSWSC 705 [2001] ACL Rep 120 NSW 118
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : BL & GY International Co. Ltd v Hypec Electronics Pty Ltd; Colin Anthony Mead v David Patrick Watson & Ors. [2001] NSWSC 705 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1933/01; 3832/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/08/2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 August 2001
BL & GY International Co. Ltd (Plaintiff) Hypec Electronics Pty Ltd (Defendant) PARTIES : Colin Anthony Mead (Plaintiff) David Patrick Watson - Liquidator (Defendant) BL & GY International Co. Ltd (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
Mr DJ Fagan SC, Mr V Bedrassin (Colin Mead) COUNSEL : Mr SL Bell (BL & GY International Co. Ltd) Ms R Sofroniou (David Patrick Watson - Liquidator) Etheringtons Solicitors (Colin Mead) SOLICITORS : Ian B Mitchell (BL & GY International Co. Ltd) A R Connolly & Co. (David Patrick Watson - Liquidator) CATCHWORDS : Company Law-Winding up-Liquidators-Exceptions to rule in Foss v Harbottle- -Contributories motion to bring a derivative cross action and to be permitted to seek leave to set aside a default judgment and to conduct a derivative defence-Whether action may be brought or continued or defended by a contributory in the name of company if this is in the interests of justice-Whether any such a rule applies to companies in liquidation-Considerations applicable to control by the court of company in liquidation-Contributory authorised to use companies name as co- defendant and as cross claimant. LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 - Sections 236 & 237 Aliprandi v Griffith Vintners Pty Ltd (in liq) (1991) 6 ACSR 250 Biposo Pty Ltd; Condon v Rodgers (No.3) (1995) 17 ACSR 730 Cadima Express Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 33 ACSR 527 Cape Bretton Co v Fenn (1881) 17 ChD 198 Christianos v Aloridge Pty Limited (1995) 131 ALR 129 Deangrove Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2001) 37 ACSR 465 Direct Acceptance Investments Pty Ltd v Blackwell (1995) 17 ACSR 89 Direct Acceptance Investments Pty Ltd v Blackwell (No. 2) (1995) 13 ACLC 1251 Evans v Bartlam [1937] AC 473 Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189 Garden Mews-St Leonards Pty Ltd v Butler Pollnow Pty Ltd - (No.2) (1984) 9 ACLR 91 Garden Mews-St Leonards Pty Limited v Butler Pollnow Pty Ltd (1984) 9 ACLR 117 CASES CITED : Kelaw Pty Ltd v Catco Developments Pty Ltd (1989) 15 NSWLR 587 Re Laverton Nickel NL (1979) 3 ACLR 945 Re Lloyd (1879) 12 ChD 447 Lloyd-Owen v Bull (1936) 4 DLR 273 Magarditch v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1999) 32 ACSR 367 Mibor Investments Pty Limited v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1993) 11 ACSR 362 Partnership Pacific Pty Limited v Aliprandi (1990) 4 ACSR 51 Phillips Oysters v National Australia Bank (Federal Court, unreported, 13 Nov 1992) Pollnow v Garden Mews-St Leonards Pty Limited (1984) 9 ACLR 82 Russell v Westpac Banking Corporation (1994) 13 ACSR 5 Scarel Pty Ltd v City Loan & Credit Corporation Pty Ltd (1988) 17 FCR 344 Vagrand Pty Ltd (in liq) v Fielding (1993) 41 FCR 550 Re Van Loun Ex parte Pattullo [1907] 1 KB 155 Wenham v General Credits Ltd [unreported, 16 December 1988-Butterworths Unreported Judgments-BC 8801203] DECISION : Application for leave to bring derivative action to be granted - short minutes to be brought in.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate