NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ASIC v Karl Suleman Enterprizes [2002] NSWSC 1039 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5414/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 October 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 October 2002
Australian Securities & Investment Commission (P) Karl Suleman Enterprizes Pty Limited (in liq) (D1) Suleman Investments Limited (D2) Karl Suleman (D3) Vivian Suleman (D4) Paul G Weston & Neil R Cussen (as liquidators of First Defendant) (D5) PARTIES : Pal Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) (D6) Froggy Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) (D7) Froggy Music Pty Ltd (in liq) (D8) Froggy Mobiles Pty Ltd (in liq) (D9) Froggy Mobiles (Western Sydney) Pty Ltd (in liq) (D10) Froggy Mobiles (Eastern Sydney) Pty Ltd (in liq) (D11) Capital Finance Australia Ltd (D12) Jessie George (D13) JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
COUNSEL : J Thomson (D5) SOLICITORS : Coudert Brothers (D5)
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - summons for examination of witnesses - whether summons should issue to minors - INFANTS AND CHILDREN - whether order for examination of a minor by a liquidator should be made LEGISLATION CITED : Corportions Act 2001 Evidence Act 1995 Doran Constructions Pty Limited (in liquidation) [2002] NSWSC 215 Re BPTC Ltd (In Liq) (1992) 29 NSWLR 713 CASES CITED : Re Hugh J Roberts Pty Ltd (1969) 91 WN (NSW) 537 Re Rothwells Ltd (Prov Liq Apptd) (1989) 15 ACLR 168 Spedley Securities Ltd (In Liquidation) v Bond Corporation Holdings Ltd (1990) 19 NSWLR 729 DECISION : Orders for examination made
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate